Has the child president fixed US industry?

Advertisement

Unlike some economists, I believe that tariffs can be a useful tool in protecting strategic industries to keep alive certain capacities that are essential to the freestanding nature of any self-sustaining society.

I could even live with something like a universal tariff, such as Trump’s 10%, though I would make it lower so it could be absorbed by producers, not consumers, for the purposes of funding the US Navy, which makes secure global trade possible.

For me, then, the failure of the child president lies not in his embrace of tariffs themselves, but rather in how he implemented them; this implementation was so misguided that the methodology used to calculate relative country rates amounted to little more than misapplying trade deficits to tariff rates.

The full text of this article is available to MacroBusiness subscribers

$1 for your first month, then:
Cancel at any time through our billing provider, Stripe
About the author
David Llewellyn-Smith is Chief Strategist at the MB Fund and MB Super. David is the founding publisher and editor of MacroBusiness and was the founding publisher and global economy editor of The Diplomat, the Asia Pacific’s leading geo-politics and economics portal. He is also a former gold trader and economic commentator at The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, the ABC and Business Spectator. He is the co-author of The Great Crash of 2008 with Ross Garnaut and was the editor of the second Garnaut Climate Change Review.